Let us assume that I'm a little backward and have a peculiar fondness for the
DOS command shell. Let us further assume that I also like blank characters in pathnames.
Let us conclude that therefore I'm hosed.
But maybe others out there are hosed, too. Blank characters in pathnames are not exactly my
exclusive fetish; others have joined in as well (
C:\Program Files
,
C:\Documents and Settings
). And when using software, you might be running
cmd.exe
without even knowing it. Many applications can run external helper
programs upon user request, be it through the UI or through the application's
macro language.
The test environment is a directory
c:\temp\foo bar
which contains
write.exe
(copied from the Windows system directory) and two text files, one of
them with a blank in its filename.
Now we open a DOS shell:
C:\>dir c:\temp\foo bar
Volume in drive C is IBM_PRELOAD
Volume Serial Number is C081-0CE2
Directory of c:\temp
File Not Found
Directory of C:\
File Not Found
C:\>dir "c:\temp\foo bar"
Volume in drive C is IBM_PRELOAD
Volume Serial Number is C081-0CE2
Directory of c:\temp\foo bar
03/18/2006 03:08 PM <DIR> .
03/18/2006 03:08 PM <DIR> ..
01/24/2006 11:19 PM 1,516 foo bar.txt
01/24/2006 11:19 PM 1,516 foo.txt
03/17/2006 09:44 AM 5,632 write.exe
3 File(s) 8,664 bytes
2 Dir(s) 17,448,394,752 bytes free
Note that we had to quote the pathname to make the
DIR
command work.
Nothing unusual here; quoting is a fact of life for anyone out there
who ever used a DOS or UNIX shell.
Trying to start
write.exe
by entering
c:\temp\foo bar\write.exe
in the
DOS shell fails; again, we need to quote:
C:\>"c:\temp\foo bar\write.exe"
And if we want to load
foo bar.txt
into the editor, we need to quote
the filename as well:
C:\>"c:\temp\foo bar\write.exe" "c:\temp\foo bar\foo bar.txt"
Still no surprises here.
But let's suppose we want to run an arbitrary command from our application
rather than from the command prompt. The C runtime library provides the
system()
function for this purpose. It is well-known that under the hood
system
actually runs
cmd.exe
to do its job.
#include <stdio.h>
#include <process.h>
int main(void)
{
char *exe = "c:\\temp\\foo bar\\write.exe";
char *path = "c:\\temp\\foo bar\\foo bar.txt";
char cmdbuf[1024];
_snprintf(cmdbuf, sizeof(cmdbuf), "\"%s\" \"%s\"", exe, path);
int ret = system(cmdbuf);
printf("system(\"%s\") returns %d\n", cmdbuf, ret);
return 0;
}
When running this code, it reports that
system()
returned 0, and
write.exe
never starts, even though we quoted both the name of the executable and
the text file name.
What's going on here?
system()
internally runs
cmd.exe
like this:
cmd.exe /c "c:\temp\foo bar\write.exe" "c:\temp\foo bar\foo bar.txt"
Try entering the above in the command prompt: No editor to be seen anywhere!
So when we run
cmd.exe
programmatically, apparently it parses its input
differently than when we use it in an interactive fashion.
I remember this problem drove me the up the freakin' wall when I first encountered
it roughly two years ago. With a lot of experimentation, I found the right
magic incantation:
_snprintf(cmdbuf, sizeof(cmdbuf), "\"\"%s\" \"%s\"\"", exe, path);
// originally: _snprintf(cmdbuf, sizeof(cmdbuf), "\"%s\" \"%s\"", exe, path);
Note that I quoted the whole command string another time! Now the executable
actually starts. Let's verify this in the command prompt window: Yes, something
like
cmd.exe /c ""c:\temp\foo bar\write.exe" "c:\temp\foo bar\foo bar.txt""
does what we want.
I was reminded of this weird behavior when John Scheffel, long-time user of our flagship
product OneSpace Designer Modeling and maintainer of the international
CoCreate user forum,
reported funny
quoting problems when trying to run executables from our app's built-in Lisp interpreter.
John also found the solution and documented it in a Lisp version.
Our Lisp implementation provides a function called
sd-sys-exec
, and you need to
invoke it
thusly:
(setf exe "c:/temp/foo bar/write.exe")
(setf path "c:/temp/foo bar/foo bar.txt")
(oli:sd-sys-exec (format nil "\"\"~A\" \"~A\"\"" exe path))
Kudos to John for figuring out the Lisp solution. Let's try to decipher all those quotes
and backslashes in the
format
statement.
Originally, I modified his solution slightly
by using
~S
instead of
~A
in the
format
call and thereby saving one level
of explicit quoting in the code:
(format nil "\"~S ~S\"" exe path))
This is much easier on the eyes, yet I overlooked that the
~S
format specifier
not only produces enclosing quotes, but also escapes any backslash characters
in the argument that it processes. So if
path
contains a backslash (not quite
unlikely on a Windows machine), the backslash will be doubled. This works
surprisingly well for some time, until you hit a UNC path which already starts
with two backslashes. As an example,
\\backslash\lashes\back
turns into
\\\\backslash\\lashes\\back
, which no DOS shell will be able to grok anymore.
John spotted this issue as well. Maybe he should be writing these blog entries,
don't you think?
From those Lisp subtleties back to the original problem:
I never
quite understood why the extra level of quoting is necessary for
cmd.exe
, but apparently, others have been in the same mess before. For example,
check out
this XEmacs code
to see how complex correct quoting can be. See also an online version of
the
help pages for CMD.EXE
for more information on the involved quoting heuristics applied by the shell.
PS: A very similar situation occurs in OneSpace Designer Drafting as well
(which is our 2D CAD application). To start an executable
write.exe
in a directory
c:\temp\foo bar
and have it open the text file
c:\temp\foo bar\foo bar.txt
,
you'll need macro code like this:
LET Cmd '"C:\temp\foo bar\write.exe"'
LET File '"C:\temp\foo bar\foo bar.txt"'
LET Fullcmd (Cmd + " " + File)
LET Fullcmd ('"' + Fullcmd + '"') { This is the important line }
RUN Fullcmd
Same procedure as above: If both the executable's path and the path of
the data file contain blank characters, the whole command string which
is passed down to
cmd.exe
needs to be enclosed in an additional
pair of quotes...
PS: See also
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/twistylittlepassagesallalike/archive/2011/04/23/everyone-quotes-arguments-the-wrong-way.aspx
http://xkcd.com/1638/
--
ClausBrod - 27 Mar 2016
to top