One of the more, uhm, challenging customer suggestions I ever had to deal with was a bug report
which requested that CoCreate Modeling should somehow - in Nostradamus fashion- sense that it
was about to crash at some point in the near future.
Yes, that's right; CoCreate Modeling was supposed to alert the user
before an actual crash
was about to happen - by applying rocket-science dynamic program analysis and prediction
techniques, sacrificing chicken and roasting them on Intel CPUs, or by having programmers dance
naked around bonfires of compiler manuals. Whatever it would take.
No doubt that such a feature would be highly valuable. Imagine working on a model for
several hours, and then you drive the application into a crash, and both the application
and your model data disappear forever. If you could predict the crash, you'd save everybody
a whole lot of time and money. Oh, and with such code, you'd always win the lottery, too.
How convenient
Fortunately, CoCreate Modeling has always had pretty elaborate crash handling mechanisms. Whenever an unexpected exception occurs, a top-level crash handler catches it, pops up a message describing the
problem, causes the current operation to be undone, restores the 3D model to a (hopefully) consistent
state, and returns the user to the interactive top-level loop so that s/he can save the
model before restarting.
Over time, we taught our crash handler to deal with more and more critical situations. (Catching stack overflows and multithreading scenarios are particularly tricky.) Hence, users rarely lose data in
CoCreate Modeling even if some piece of code crashes. Which pretty much obviates the need
for the proposed clairvoyance module.
to top